OTHERPLANE

Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Reader writes:

Just wondering where you people obtain your information? You are presenting this info as fact, although much of the information you have posted is disputed by "Real" researchers in the area of cryptozoology, such as your claim that "Bigfoot" and "Yeti" are not related. You also indicate that Bigfoot has only 4 toes? Just where did you get that gem of info, when MOST of the hundreds of foot prints show clearly a 5 toed animal?

Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Otherplane's reply:

We (Otherplane), provide information to the readers as we see it and these informations were not extracted from any books and or some other media. We Otherplane cannot dispute what the educated researchers have concluded during their tenure of studies, however, when you can get these educated "people" to agree with one another on one discipline or so, then maybe we can pursue ours (Otherplane's), in our own way. At times, in some other field of science, these researchers will always verify some of the informations that we already knew but cannot publish. You put bigfoot on top of the Alps and see how long will that sucker last. Related? Are the black, white and yellow folks related? Hmmmm, fooled us! The word "most" is running parallel to the word "if", wouldn't you say so?

We (Otherplane), are not afraid to be proven wrong and when we are, we will acknowledge to that. We did not mean to rattle your cage but all of the informations that you see on our website were based on OUR own research and speculations. We appreciate your inquiry and concern, and only time will provide all of us the answers we are searching for. We are considering posting the migratory path of a "bigfoot clan".

Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Reader writes:

Are black, yellow, and white folks related? Absolutely, so would be Bigfoot and the Abominable snowman, although probably of a different sub-species. Also, if bigfoot exists, then it would probably find living in the high Alps of little difficulty since the altitude is comparable to that of the Canadian rockies. It is also doubtful that the Yeti actually spends most of its time in the high elevations of Mt. Everest. It is believed by many that the creature spends most of its time in the lower elevations of the Everest rainforest areas.

Don't get me wrong, I think that some of the conclusions that you have drawn may very well be right on the money, such as the social order of these animals. Sightings of these creatures in group settings usually involved sightings one male and several females. Now, as far as the four toes thing is concerned, I'm still wondering how you came about that conclusion. I'm also not trying to rattle your cage, just a little lively debate.

Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Otherplane's reply:

We did the Bigfoot several yeas ago and we tried to cover the total spectrum of the big guy, but we do not remember why we came up with four toes. We always scrutinize the answer if it's not logical but somehow the four toes stayed. Bigfoot has always been of great interest to everyone and most anxiously await confirmation/verification that Bigfoot does exist. Random sightings and finding footprints is not enough to conclusively prove the existence of Bigfoot.

We are debating publishing the where-abouts of Bigfoot because of concerns that there are folks who may use our information to capture (and in the process of capturing, kill a Bigfoot member), for individual benefit. The only way we may consider publishing this type of information, is by working with a reputable (scientific) organization dedicated to Bigfoot research.