OTHERPLANE

Related Account "The Evolution of the Yeti and Bigfoot"


Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Reader writes:

What I am about to envoke upon, will chill and clear the cockles of the mind.

Many centuries ago, the christian crusaders had sought out satanists, these satanic cult members had to run to the hills, or should I say, "Stay very Illusive".

Europe had such orders, such as the French order of the satanic cult, many scattered to remote corners of the world to resume their practices. They performed such practice as human sacrifice and indulged in anything unGodly such as lustful orgies and even beastiality. Out of acts such as beastiality, certain freaks of nature were born into this world, half man half gorrilla. The very decendent of the Yeti was brought over via the Mongols to Alaska. A carried seed of an act that was... from intercourse of human and ape. Big Foot is not evolution, but rather the product some very evil people who had sex with animals. Now known as Big Foot or Bigfoot as told by the American Indian. They reside in America.

Fri, 02 Mar 2001, Otherplane's reply:

Your theory does have some merit. However, this scenario could have taken place much earlier than what you suggest.

Humans separated from other humans, by accident or as a sole survivor of animal attack, is then adopted by or becomes friendly with animals, and given in to individual basic instincts of affection and love... could have moved beyond that of immorale behavior (to modern human thinking). In-time, the off-spring would (in effect) create a new species.

The only hope to satisfy this argument is to physically capture and study this... Yeti and Bigfoot and others (that we do not usually hear or read much of). The recent achievement of "mapping the DNA" of human and animal... should either support or not support this theory.

It should be noted that there are humans who are born displaying animal-like characteristics and physical features. One that comes to mind is... the brothers, of Mexican decent, who have hair covering their entire body. While most would accept that humans do have hair covering their entire body, there are less than a few who have hair over an inch long and densely concentrated (as only an animal would have). Most would say that this is a "freak of nature".

While Nature does or did have a role to play in the evolution of the world (including mankind), Nature is no longer a factor today. There are beliefs that animal and humans share similar DNA (gene) makeup... and from time-to-time, a combination of genes will skew the outcome of the human product. So why are not animals having the same affect... or are they but we humans are not seeing it?


Related Accounts - Ancient Myths Index Ancient Myths Home Page Otherplane Home Page